Why do authors use indirect characterisation more often?

Authors prefer indirect characterisation because it is more engaging. It follows the classic writing rule of 'show, don't tell.' When readers have to deduce a character's personality from their actions, it makes the reading experience more interactive and believable.

Can a character's physical appearance be part of their characterisation?

Yes. An author might describe a character as wearing meticulously ironed clothes to indirectly characterize them as highly organized or strict. However, standard physical traits (like height or eye color) only count as characterisation if they reveal something about the character's personality, background, or social standing.

What is the difference between characterisation and character development?

Characterisation is how the author presents and reveals who the character is at any given moment. Character development refers to the way a character changes, grows, or regresses over the course of the entire story.

What is characterisation?

Characterisation is the way a writer reveals the personality, motives, and background of a character in a story. It is the literary device that turns a simple name on a page into a fully formed person you can love, hate, or relate to.<br><br>Think of it like meeting someone new. Sometimes a mutual friend will just tell you exactly what they are like. Other times, you figure out who they are by watching how they dress, listening to what they say, and observing how they treat others. Authors use these exact same approaches to introduce you to their characters.

Direct vs. Indirect Characterisation

Authors generally use two methods to build a character. Direct characterisation is when the author explicitly tells you what a character is like. For example, the narrator might say, 'Sarah was a generous soul.' Indirect characterisation is when the author shows you who the character is through their actions, thoughts, and dialogue. Instead of telling you Sarah is generous, the author might describe Sarah giving her last dollar to a stranger. Most good writing relies heavily on indirect characterisation because it allows readers to draw their own conclusions.

How to recognise it: The STEAL Method

When analysing indirect characterisation, you can use the STEAL acronym to remember what to look for. Speech: What does the character say, and how do they speak? Thoughts: What is revealed through their private mind and feelings? Effect on others: How do other characters react to them? Actions: What does the character do? Looks: What does their physical appearance or clothing suggest about their personality? By tracking these five elements, you can easily piece together a character's true nature.

Where students slip up

A common mistake is confusing characterisation with plot. A plot is the sequence of events (what happens), whereas characterisation focuses on the people experiencing those events (who they are). If an assignment asks you to analyse characterisation, do not just summarize the story. Instead, focus on specific quotes where a character makes a choice or speaks in a certain way, and explain what that choice proves about their personality.

Worked through

Read the following passage and identify one example of direct characterisation and one example of indirect characterisation: 'Arthur was a profoundly impatient man. He tapped his foot furiously as the barista fumbled with the espresso machine, rolling his eyes at the customer behind him.'

The direct characterisation is the sentence 'Arthur was a profoundly impatient man.' The author is explicitly telling us Arthur's personality trait. The indirect characterisation is the description of Arthur's actions: 'He tapped his foot furiously... rolling his eyes.' These physical behaviors show his impatience without explicitly stating the word.

Questions students ask

Ask about this topic

Explain at

Where this comes from: OpenStax Introduction to Literature · Khan Academy: Reading and Analyzing Fiction